← All compounds
Compound Deep-Dive
Tier 4: PeptideA high-potential mitochondrial peptide that currently lacks the human clinical data required to justify its cost and risk for most users.
MOTS-c
Mitochondrial-derived peptideMDPMOTS-c peptideMitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-cMDP MOTS-c
High potential, zero human proof.
Hype Risk
8/10
Noticeability
6/10
Evidence Tier
Research only
Cost / Month
~$120
Research only
What it's actually good for
Focus: neutralSleep: neutralRecovery: alignedMood: neutralImmunity: neutral
How it works
Extensive animal research shows MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity and exercise capacity. Human data is limited to observational studies and small pilot trials with analogs, leaving its therapeutic efficacy in humans unproven.
Activates the AMPK pathway and regulates the folate-methionine cycle to enhance glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation.
Safety
- Injection site reactions (welts, stinging) are common.
- Potential for increased heart rate or palpitations.
- Long-term human safety data is non-existent.
The full StackRoast report adds
- The exact dose, timing, and effective range to actually run it at
- Where people go wrong with it — the dose-creep and timing traps
- What MOTS-c clashes with or duplicates in your stack
Community Reality Check
Distilled from 1200 threads
Community Reality Check
Distilled from 1200 threadsConfidence: medium
What users report
- Improved exercise stamina
- Faster recovery
- Metabolic flexibility
The catch
- Painful injections
- Expensive maintenance
- Variable product quality
Side effects reported
- Injection site welts
- Increased heart rate
- Lethargy (rare)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Peptides/https://www.reddit.com/r/Biohackers/https://www.reddit.com/r/Peptideshttps://www.reddit.com/r/Longevity
The Receipts
8 sources— studies, videos & links
The Receipts
8 sources— studies, videos & linksVideos
Papers
Creators
Clinical Sources
Taking MOTS-c in a stack? Find out if the combination actually makes sense.
Roast My Stack →